As the electoral season intensifies across the University of Ibadan, With a few departments, faculties and Hall already conducting their electoral process while others just kicked off their own procedure, it is evident that election fever is sweeping through the University as the session nears its close.
A central concern in every electoral process remains: how should we evaluate the candidates seeking leadership positions, and what are the most effective criteria for assessing their qualifications and suitability for office?
Generally, in Nigeria, political acumen, ideology, and ability to lead often take a backseat to personality, popularity, and, in some cases, financial influence. Popularity can often sway the electorate more than any political ideology or platform, with candidates relying on financial resources to boost their chances of success. This has deepened the issues of corruption and accountability in the system, as elected officials frequently prioritize recovering campaign expenses over fulfilling promises.
This trend is mirrored in Nigerian universities, including the University of Ibadan, where elections are typically influenced by the candidates' personalities and how well they connect with the electorate. Voters often prioritize traits like demeanor, politeness, and familiarity, overlooking the candidate’s plans and qualifications. In some cases, religious and tribal affiliations also play a significant role in determining a candidate’s appeal.
This raises the crucial question: why should a University, a citadel of learning, elect leaders based on personality and goodwill rather than ideology and competence? This approach often results in elected leaders who lack the necessary skills or vision to execute their responsibilities effectively. A notable example is former President Buhari, whose election was largely based on perceived personality rather than substantive plans, leading to severe economic challenges for the country. Despite the lessons of history, many continue to fall into the same traps, and the current administration still faces mounting criticism.
At the University of Ibadan, especially within the Zik Hall elections, fame and likability seem to be the decisive factors. The more popular and approachable a candidate is, the more likely they are to win. However, we must ask ourselves: should a candidate’s personality and popularity outweigh their ability to deliver on their promises? It is clear that we often complain about poor leadership while continuing to elect leaders based on superficial qualities that do not ensure effective governance.
Ultimately, it is crucial that Uites make informed choices, focusing not just on a candidate’s fame, recognition or personality but also on their plans, ideologies, and ability to bring them to fruition. Elections should be about more than familiarity or charisma; they should be about finding leaders who are truly capable of achieving meaningful change. If we continue to prioritize personal relationships over policies, we risk perpetuating bad leadership and reaping the consequences of our choices.
